{"id":5168,"date":"2010-08-25T10:49:13","date_gmt":"2010-08-25T14:49:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/?p=5168"},"modified":"2010-08-25T10:49:13","modified_gmt":"2010-08-25T14:49:13","slug":"vultures-as-angels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/2010\/08\/25\/vultures-as-angels\/","title":{"rendered":"Vultures as Angels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/Rates.JPG\" alt=\"Mortgage Rates are very attractive right now\" title=\"Mortgage Rates are very attractive right now\" width=\"466\" height=\"466\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-5170\" align=\"left\" \/>There was an <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704720004575377022447064474.html\">interesting article in last week&#8217;s Wall Street Journal about the success a hedge fund is having in modifying mortgages and keeping homeowners in their homes<\/a>.  The point of the article was to highlight a successful private market example of mortgage modifications, in this case a distressed investment fund, as compared to the highly publicized Federal programs like the <a href=\"http:\/\/makinghomeaffordable.gov\/index.html\">Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A key difference between the hedge fund&#8217;s strategy and HAMP seems to be the willingness to reduce the principal owed on the loans.  The hedge fund forgives a portion of the principal in 90% of their modifications.  Federally regulated banks subject to HAMP, according to the article, are more likely to lower interest rates, give homeowners time to catch up on late payments, and extend the length of the loan.  They only forgive a portion of the principal in 2% of their modifications.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the strong case that the article makes for the private market strategy over government involvement, it identifies two critical factors that limit the hedge fund&#8217;s effectiveness:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Many mortgages have thousands of owners.<\/strong>  Because mortgages were packaged into securities for resale, the infamous Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) that were part of the credit crisis, it is often impossible to buy (and therefore modify) individual mortgages &#8211; they have thousands of owners.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Banks don&#8217;t want to recognize losses.<\/strong>  If a mortgage does have a single owner, like a bank, then that owner has to be willing to sell the loan at a steep discount in order for it to be attractive to the hedge fund.  After all, they&#8217;re doing this to make money.  The strategy banks currently employ of lowering rates and extending the term allows them to push any losses into the future.<\/p>\n<p>In the end there is no suggested way forward, though presumably the author would hold up the private market model as the ideal.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/money\/economy\/housing\/2010-07-20-mortgage-aid_N.htm\">Reports from the government itself seem to show that the Federal programs are not working for everyone either<\/a>.  For many homeowners, the end result is likely to be foreclosure unless the economy and housing markets bounce back quickly.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704720004575377022447064474.html\">Check out the full article for an interesting story<\/a>, and by all accounts a successful mortgage modification strategy for certain homeowners.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was an interesting article in last week&#8217;s Wall Street Journal about the success a hedge fund is having in modifying mortgages and keeping homeowners in their homes. The point of the article was to highlight a successful private market example of mortgage modifications, in this case a distressed investment fund, as compared to the highly publicized Federal programs like the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). A key difference between the hedge fund&#8217;s strategy and<\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a class=\"myButt three\" href=\"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/2010\/08\/25\/vultures-as-angels\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1585,1596],"tags":[2125,2236,2454,2526,2707,2824,3047],"class_list":["post-5168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mortgages","category-think-big","tag-federal","tag-hamp","tag-loan-modification","tag-mortgage-modifications","tag-ranieri","tag-selene","tag-wall-street-journal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5168\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amybergquist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}